Arbitration as a means of conflict resolution, limited to those parts of the right device, in which the public order of the State is protected you must estenderse and applies far beyond what currently is used. It is not new in our historical tradition as either goes back with its own the Roman law characters either this law, or in equity as in both cases it allows a putting our disputes in the hands of a neutral arbitrator, neutrality than neceariamente has been born of the previous acceptance of the arbitrator or arbitrators by the parties. Today in the field of consumption come to him very often, perhaps only to save costs as they are usually controversies at derimir for derisory amounts, but in contracts are e.g. mobile telephony, does not prevent the client may feel desemparado when not despised as it is customary for major brands or give the facePerhaps in the background they are aware of the abuses which are committed and what is worse, It brings account, because even losing does not let them be profitable the arbitration system. However the field of arbitration should expand towards those dead zones that today is not used and that to be available right, can be perfectly encardinarse in this heterocomposicion mode.But not only the arbitration itself but the subjugation in all kinds of contracts to previous conciliatory acts is not only contrary to law in the part that does not affect the order and public interest, including the conciliation is encouraged every day in the own jurisdiction, both for procedural economy how much by what has of acceptance of the claim of others voluntarily and therefore by a greater willingness to compromise. Our modern society is historical debtor from other yesteryear less complex societies and therefore where the cut of a good man came to resolve quite a few conflicts, the complexity of trade and human relations as of today, does not facilitate things; We must not forget the old aphorism that therefore What we can resolve from the vantage point of good faith, should not attend the Judicial headquarters because a bad agreement than a good lawsuit is better. Original author and source of the article.